The Importance of Including Truth Emergency
Inside the International Progressive Media
Reform Movement    By Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff

An international truth emergency, now in evidence, is
the result of fraudulent elections, compromised 9/11
investigations, illegal preemptive wars, and a continued
top down corporate media propaganda. Glenn Beck recently was
able to say on national Fox television news that 9/11 truth people
openly supported the shooting at the Holocaust Museum. Beck
claimed that 9/11 truth proponents see James von Brunn as a
“hero.” Beck’s statement is completely without factual merit and
represents a hyperrealist slamming of a group already slanderously
pre-labeled by the corporate media as “conspiracy theorists.”

A truth emergency is predicated on the inability of many to
distinguish between what is real and what is not. Corporate
media, Fox in particular, offers news that creates a hyperreality
of real world problems and issues. Consumers of corporate
television news—especially those whose understandings are
framed primarily from that medium alone—are embedded in a
state of excited delirium of knowinglessness. This lack of factual
awareness of issues like election fraud in 2004, and the increasing
evidence of 9/11 Commission report inaccuracies, often leaves
people politically paralyzed.

To counter knowinglessness, media activists need to include truth
emergency issues as important elements of radical-progressive
media reform efforts. We must not be afraid of corporate media
labeling and instead build truth from the bottom up. Critical
thinking and fact-finding are the basis of democracy, and we must
stand for the maximization of informed participatory democracy
at the lowest possible level in society.

Conspiracies tend to be actions by small groups of individuals rather
than massive collective plots by entire governments. However,
small groups can be dangerous, especially when the individuals
have significant power in huge public and private bureaucracies.
Corporate boards of directors meet in closed rooms to plan to
how best to maximize profit. If they knowingly make plans that
hurt others, violate laws, undermine ethics, or show favoritism to
friends, they are involved in a conspiracy.

The first thing critics of unofficial investigations into 9/11,
election fraud, and other controversial issues do is link together
all the questions and/or line of inquiry as if they all have equal
validity. Obviously, they do not. This, however, allows critics to
dismiss fact-based, transparent inquiries into major problems with
official explanations of these crucial matters. These are fallacies
of overgeneralization, straw persons, appeals to authority, and
full on red herring distractions from actual fact-based, scientific
investigations. These tactics avoid the debates entirely. We must
not be afraid to openly discuss, research, and validate these issues.

Former Brigham Young University physics professor Steven
E. Jones and some 700 scientific professionals in the fields of
architecture, engineering, and physics have now concluded that
the official explanation for the collapse of the World Trade Center
(WTC) buildings is implausible according to laws of physics.
Especially concerning is the collapse of WTC 7, a forty-sevenstory
building that was not hit by planes, yet dropped in its own
“footprint” in 6.6 seconds in the same manner as a controlled
demolition.

To support his theory, Jones and eight other scientists conducted
chemical research on the dust from the World Trade centers.
Their research results were published in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal Open Chemical Physics Journal, Volume 2, 2009. The
authors write, “We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in
all the samples. The properties of these chips were analyzed using
optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray
energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC). The red portion of these chips is found to be
an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.” Thermite is
a pyrotechnic composition of a metal powder and a metal oxide,
which produces an aluminothermic reaction known as a thermite
reaction and is used in controlled demolitions of buildings.

Progressive media activists should openly support 9/11 Truth
and other truth emergency issues as an important component of
building a new non-exploitative world based on media democracy,
full transparency and openness, and fundamental human rights.
Peter Phillips, Professor Sociology, Sonoma State University,
President, Media Freedom Foundation/Project Censored, 9/11
Truth Steering Committee.

Mickey Huff, Associate Professor History, Diablo Valley College,
Executive Committee, Media Freedom Foundation/Project
Censored, 9/11 Truth Advisory Committee.